Shared commissions with co-op brokers
If any buyer's broker (or any of his/her agents) brings the buyer for the property, the buyer's broker would typically be compensated with a co-op commission coming from the total offered to the listing broker, often about half of the full commission from the seller. If an agent or salesperson working for the buyer's broker brings the buyer for the property, then the buyer's broker would commonly compensate his agent with a fraction of the co-op commission, again as determined in a separate agreement. A discount brokerage may offer a reduced commission in the event no other brokerage firm is involved and no co-op commission is paid out.

If there is no co-commission to pay to another brokerage, the listing brokerage receives the full amount of the commission minus any other types of expenses.


Potential points of contention for agents
Real estate commissions are becoming a point of controversy. Home values in many areas have quadrupled over the past 20 years. This may be contributing to the increased number of licensed agents and growing competition between them. The number of real estate agents in areas tends to rise when home values do, and the productivity of existing agents goes down. The rewards have increased, but so have the demands of clients and business risks faced by agents. In North America, agents have had to become familiar with marketing through the internet as well as traditional print and other media. Additionally the law is complicated with issues such as defects in housing, grow houses and other issues of which the agent is the front line defense for his client. There is more liability than ever in advising buyers and sellers.

Another controversy exists for the commissions to real estate agents. If a listing agent sells a property for any amount above the listed price, he in turn will make additional income. In theory, this will motivate him/her to get top dollar price for his client, the seller. However, if the agent representing the buyer attempts to obtain a lower sales price for his client, then he/she would make a lower commission. Thus, it could be considered to be in the agent's best interest to advise his client to purchase the property at a higher price.

In practical terms, there is rarely a great enough difference between the listing (asking) price and the negotiated selling price to make a significant difference between the commissions generated on each side, and certainly hardly enough to justify an agent failing in his fiduciary duty to obtain the best terms for his/her client.

Another potential conflict of interest exists when a listing agent in a very active real estate market has incentive to sell properties quickly at unnecessarily low prices in order to benefit from a high volume of sales.

In any case, agents who create satisfied clients and develop subsequent referrals are likely to do far better in the long run.

Copyright © 2007 New Jersey Realtors